Republicans Brand 'Save America Act' as Only Cure to Manufactured National Crisis
Populist strongman messaging & people-vs-elite framing
GOP figures insist that passing the vaguely defined “Save America Act” is the sole way to rescue the country, using alarmist slogans instead of policy details. The crisis language manufactures urgency around an undefined bill, a classic strongman tactic to pressure lawmakers and rally supporters.
Not currently in top 6 — This topic dropped out of the trending list. Last seen 3mo ago. It may return if the talking point is picked up again.
Appeared in top 6 8 times — first seen 6mo ago — currently on its 3rd wave (it went quiet and resurfaced before)
Spread Overview
Narrative Spread Timeline
Echo post volume by day, broken down by platform — click a bar to filter the echo feed below to that date
Bars stacked by platform. Click a bar to filter echoes below. ⚡ in tooltip = volume spike above average.
Platform Breakdown
Message Mutation Examples
The original talking point alongside the closest echo found and the most drifted echo — see exactly how the message changed in transit
GOP figures insist that passing the vaguely defined “Save America Act” is the sole way to rescue the country, using alarmist slogans instead of policy details. The crisis language manufactures urgency around an undefined bill, a classic strongman tactic to pressure lawmakers and rally supporters.
BS nonsense. The Save Act proposes a solution to a nonexistent problem while simultaneously disenfranchising millions of Americans, particularly women who changed their names after getting married. Both the CATO Institute and Heritage Foundation (conservative organizations) say that voter fraud is miniscule. Some Facts: Data from the Heritage Foundation Study (1999-2023) 77 cases of non-citizens successfully cas…
If the Save America Act means using the 25th Amendment…then yes, I agree!
Echo Posts
Non-government posts and articles echoing this talking point, sorted by date
BS nonsense. The Save Act proposes a solution to a nonexistent problem while simultaneously disenfranchising millions of Americans, particularly women who changed their names after getting married. Both the CATO Institute and Heritage Foundation (conservative organizations) say that voter fraud is miniscule. Some Facts: Data from the Heritage Foundation Study (1999-2023) 77 cases of non-citizens successfully casting a ballot over 24 years. 10 cases of undocumented immigrants who voted 1 billion+ ballots Estimated total votes cast in the U.S. (1999-2023) 0.00000764% Minuscule Percentage of All Votes. The Bottom Line: Even using data from a conservative organization looking for fraud, the instances of non-citizens voting are statistically microscopic. So why are they making it difficult for hard working Americans to vote… unless that it their objective?
I don't have a problem with simple voter ID. The "Save America Act" is not just voter ID. It virtually eliminates mail-in voting. It has the federal government purge the states' voter rolls periodicly.. It makes it more difficult to vote. That's the definition of voter suppression. Call it whatever cynical name you like, but it's clearly VOTER SUPPRESSION!!! BTW the constitution gives pretty much everything related to elections and voting in the hands of the states. This is a dramatic federal overreach that tramples states rights.
I don't have a problem with simple voter ID. The "Save America Act" is not just voter ID. It virtually eliminates mail-in voting. It has the federal government purge the states' voter rolls periodicly.. It makes it more difficult to vote. That's the definition of voter suppression. Call it whatever cynical name you like, but it's clearly VOTER SUPPRESSION!!! BTW the constitution gives pretty much everything related to elections and voting in the hands of the states. This is a dramatic federal overreach that tramples states rights.
BS nonsense. The Save Act proposes a solution to a nonexistent problem while simultaneously disenfranchising millions of Americans, particularly women who changed their names after getting married. Both the CATO Institute and Heritage Foundation (conservative organizations) say that voter fraud is miniscule. Some Facts: Data from the Heritage Foundation Study (1999-2023) 77 cases of non-citizens successfully casting a ballot over 24 years. 10 cases of undocumented immigrants who voted 1 billion+ ballots Estimated total votes cast in the U.S. (1999-2023) 0.00000764% Minuscule Percentage of All Votes. The Bottom Line: Even using data from a conservative organization looking for fraud, the instances of non-citizens voting are statistically microscopic. So why are they making it difficult for hard working Americans to vote… unless that it their objective?
I don't have a problem with simple voter ID. The "Save America Act" is not just voter ID. It virtually eliminates mail-in voting. It has the federal government purge the states' voter rolls periodicly.. It makes it more difficult to vote. That's the definition of voter suppression. Call it whatever cynical name you like, but it's clearly VOTER SUPPRESSION!!! BTW the constitution gives pretty much everything related to elections and voting in the hands of the states. This is a dramatic federal overreach that tramples states rights.
Voter ID, fine. Voter suppression, no.
Our elections are secure. We have to provide proof of citizenship when we register to vote. Also, the FEDERALLY MANDATED REAL ID requires proof of citizenship to obtain and should be more than adequate ID. The Constitution mandates Elections to be run by the States not the Executive Branch.
Voter ID, fine. Voter suppression, no.
There's a huge difference between having a Valid ID and the Save America Act.
We have safe and fair elections. Everyone who is already a registered voter had ID to register. People who register to vote who have not voted have to show ID when they register.
Our elections are secure. We have to provide proof of citizenship when we register to vote. Also, the FEDERALLY MANDATED REAL ID requires proof of citizenship to obtain and should be more than adequate ID. The Constitution mandates Elections to be run by the States not the Executive Branch.
I don't have a problem with simple voter ID. The "Save America Act" is not just voter ID. It virtually eliminates mail-in voting. It has the federal government purge the states' voter rolls periodicly.. It makes it more difficult to vote. That's the definition of voter suppression. Call it whatever cynical name you like, but it's clearly VOTER SUPPRESSION!!! BTW the constitution gives pretty much everything related to elections and voting in the hands of the states. This is a dramatic federal overreach that tramples states rights.
I've worked on Election Board for a few years. If you actually lived in Kansas you'd know absolutely every voter must shown their ID. I'm working there i I have to show my ID. My neighbors I've known for 20 years must show their ID. My nieces and nephew must show their ID. The address on the ID has to match the address on the rolls. Two people on the board verify the information. The fact our "senator" doesn't know diddly-squat about our voting process proves he needs to be replaced.
Yes voter ID but not voter suppression! There is a big difference.
There's a huge difference between having a Valid ID and the Save America Act.
BS nonsense. The Save Act proposes a solution to a nonexistent problem while simultaneously disenfranchising millions of Americans, particularly women who changed their names after getting married. Both the CATO Institute and Heritage Foundation (conservative organizations) say that voter fraud is miniscule. Some Facts: Data from the Heritage Foundation Study (1999-2023) 77 cases of non-citizens successfully casting a ballot over 24 years. 10 cases of undocumented immigrants who voted 1 billion+ ballots Estimated total votes cast in the U.S. (1999-2023) 0.00000764% Minuscule Percentage of All Votes. The Bottom Line: Even using data from a conservative organization looking for fraud, the instances of non-citizens voting are statistically microscopic. So why are they making it difficult for hard working Americans to vote… unless that it their objective?
The Save America Act is no different than banning insider trading: Rep Anna Paulina Luna. Larry Kudlow and Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna discuss President Trump's refusal to sign a housing bill, demanding
The point is the it makes it hard to register. There are at least 30 days before each election to catch these things. Read how the far right tore apart one of the best tools to fight voter fraud. Another lie from Marlin Stutzman the putz. beachyforcongress.com https://www.npr.org/2023/06/04/1171159008/eric-investigation-voter-data-election-integrity
There's a huge difference between having a Valid ID and the Save America Act.
Currently anyone applying for a driver's license gets automatically registered to vote. SAVE act will make it necessary to prove citizenship to REGISTER! As it should...
I voted just last week. Had to present my picture I’d on my driver’s license. That I’d was matched to my voter registration record and I signed to attest the accuracy. Voter ID is not an issue!
Yes voter ID but not voter suppression! There is a big difference.
It’s a good thing then that it’s been proven that illegals voting is extremely rare and represents about .00001% of all votes. Even the far right group, the Heritage Foundation did a study and came to the conclusion that illegals voting is so rare it would not have any impact on an election result.
No we do not support the Save Act .
We don‘t want Trump‘s SAVE Act, that act is all about saving him. He gets richer and attains immunity from the IRS for himself and his family, and working Americans get poorer. He should be focusing on changing that fact!
The point is the it makes it hard to register. There are at least 30 days before each election to catch these things. Read how the far right tore apart one of the best tools to fight voter fraud. Another lie from Marlin Stutzman the putz. beachyforcongress.com https://www.npr.org/2023/06/04/1171159008/eric-investigation-voter-data-election-integrity
BS nonsense. The Save Act proposes a solution to a nonexistent problem while simultaneously disenfranchising millions of Americans, particularly women who changed their names after getting married. Both the CATO Institute and Heritage Foundation (conservative organizations) say that voter fraud is miniscule. Some Facts: Data from the Heritage Foundation Study (1999-2023) 77 cases of non-citizens successfully casting a ballot over 24 years. 10 cases of undocumented immigrants who voted 1 billion+ ballots Estimated total votes cast in the U.S. (1999-2023) 0.00000764% Minuscule Percentage of All Votes. The Bottom Line: Even using data from a conservative organization looking for fraud, the instances of non-citizens voting are statistically microscopic. So why are they making it difficult for hard working Americans to vote… unless that it their objective?
Any state can check any registered voter they want now. Government has all the relevant records. Voter rolls are a matter of public record. Existing laws are perfectly adequate.
The View Faces Criticism for False Claims on Voter ID and SAVE America Act
BS nonsense. The Save Act proposes a solution to a nonexistent problem while simultaneously disenfranchising millions of Americans, particularly women who changed their names after getting married. Both the CATO Institute and Heritage Foundation (conservative organizations) say that voter fraud is miniscule. Some Facts: Data from the Heritage Foundation Study (1999-2023) 77 cases of non-citizens successfully casting a ballot over 24 years. 10 cases of undocumented immigrants who voted 1 billion+ ballots Estimated total votes cast in the U.S. (1999-2023) 0.00000764% Minuscule Percentage of All Votes. The Bottom Line: Even using data from a conservative organization looking for fraud, the instances of non-citizens voting are statistically microscopic. So why are they making it difficult for hard working Americans to vote… unless that it their objective?
It's the requirements for proving citizenship when registering that's the issue. Millions of citizens don't have easy access to their birth certificate or a passport. Sen. Lisa Murkowski discussed the expense Alaskans would face in obtaining the necessary paperwork. It was on C-SPAN. You should check it out.
Remember: you need an ID to enter the new Obama Library. Just saying it is silly to still have this issue with required IDs for one of the most important parts of our nation, voting.
I've worked on Election Board for a few years. If you actually lived in Kansas you'd know absolutely every voter must shown their ID. I'm working there i I have to show my ID. My neighbors I've known for 20 years must show their ID. My nieces and nephew must show their ID. The address on the ID has to match the address on the rolls. Two people on the board verify the information. The fact our "senator" doesn't know diddly-squat about our voting process proves he needs to be replaced.
So a valid ID, like a driver's license???
I've worked on Election Board for a few years. If you actually lived in Kansas you'd know absolutely every voter must shown their ID. I'm working there i I have to show my ID. My neighbors I've known for 20 years must show their ID. My nieces and nephew must show their ID. The address on the ID has to match the address on the rolls. Two people on the board verify the information. The fact our "senator" doesn't know diddly-squat about our voting process proves he needs to be replaced.
Photo ID. Yes. Proof of citizenship. No.
The point is the it makes it hard to register. There are at least 30 days before each election to catch these things. Read how the far right tore apart one of the best tools to fight voter fraud. Another lie from Marlin Stutzman the putz. beachyforcongress.com https://www.npr.org/2023/06/04/1171159008/eric-investigation-voter-data-election-integrity
Why are you supporting Voter Suppression?
The point is the it makes it hard to register. There are at least 30 days before each election to catch these things. Read how the far right tore apart one of the best tools to fight voter fraud. Another lie from Marlin Stutzman the putz. beachyforcongress.com https://www.npr.org/2023/06/04/1171159008/eric-investigation-voter-data-election-integrity
I voted just last week. Had to present my picture I’d on my driver’s license. That I’d was matched to my voter registration record and I signed to attest the accuracy. Voter ID is not an issue!
If Congress doesn’t vote for SAVE AMERICA, Dems take over all in next year and progressively over all “3” branches before 2030 …and America never returns 🤮🤡❤️🩹 SAVE AMERICA must pass in Senate before Fall 2026 🇺🇸🙏🇺🇸
Each election is certified by the Secretary of State from that state, correct? So that means both Republicans and Democrats. So does that mean the votes that come from certified Republican states are also “illegal”?
Rep. Marlin Stutzman Stop dogging the question, and show proof that non-citizens are voting if you want this to happen.
If the Save Act is passed, would it be the saviest save of all the saves ever saved?
Gop should pass save act or the old man suck will take over as senate president and the impet impet will start.
One of the first lessons that one learns from that Econ 101 class is that if the marginal social benefit of a government action doesn't outweigh the marginal social cost, it should not be enacted. The SAVE Act has an extremely low marginal social benefit since virtually no one is falsifying their identity to vote, but it has a high marginal social cost as it will force millions of citizens to jump through hoops to prove themselves citizens. The SAVE Act simply isn’t worth it.
Ohio has ID required already. Who doesn’t?
Why are you supporting Voter Suppression?
Only citizens do vote under current laws. So, a solution in search of a problem
If the Save America Act means using the 25th Amendment…then yes, I agree!
Showing 50 of 55 total echoes.