14th Amendment Guarantees Birthright Citizenship; Republicans Move to Strip It From Immigrant Children

GOP lawmakers say constitutional amendment needed to end birthright citizenship. The Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump's order seeking to limit birthright citizenship. The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution gives citizenship to anyone born in the United States with limited exceptions

The Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision is an utter disgrace. The 14th Amendment was NEVER intended to grant birthright citizenship to children of illegal aliens. Congress must immediately take action to protect American sovereignty and citizenship.

Supreme Court Affirms Original Meaning of Birthright Citizenship, Strikes Down Trump's Executive Order. Yet the 14th Amendment's grant of birthright citizenship would cover them, too. "If the mere fact of being born in the

The Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision is an utter disgrace. The 14th Amendment was NEVER intended to grant birthright citizenship to children of illegal aliens. Congress must immediately take action to protect American sovereignty and citizenship.

Birthright citizenship is not an “abuse.” It is in the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court did not create it. The Court upheld the long-standing constitutional rule that people born in the United States are citizens, with very limited exceptions. That principle goes back more than a century, including the 1898 Wong Kim Ark decision. If Congresswoman Miller wants to change that, she should say the quiet part out loud: she is talking about changing who counts as an American under the Constitution. That is not “protecting sovereignty.” That is rewriting citizenship because today’s politics does not like tomorrow’s voters.

Birthright citizenship: Is it settled? | Opinion. The Supreme Court rejected an attempt to end birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents

Why are you so hateful? Assuming immigrants are here to harm “us!” Birthright citizenship isn’t a “loophole”. And for once this Supreme Court got it right.

So if the United States is invaded all the kids born are citizens. Not the intention of the amendment but it is what it is.

The Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision is an utter disgrace. The 14th Amendment was NEVER intended to grant birthright citizenship to children of illegal aliens. Congress must immediately take action to protect American sovereignty and citizenship.

Major blow to Trump as US Supreme Court keeps birthright citizenship intact

Today’s Supreme Court ruling wasn’t really about whether people support or oppose immigration. It was about the Constitution. The Court held that the 14th Amendment protects birthright citizenship for nearly all children born on U.S. soil and that a president cannot change that constitutional protection through an executive order. People are free to disagree with birthright citizenship as a policy. That’s part of democracy. But if the Constitution says something different, the role of the Supreme Court is to interpret and apply the Constitution—not rewrite it. If Americans believe the 14th Amendment should be changed, there is a constitutional process for doing that. Until then, the Constitution remains the law of the land. Whether you agree with the policy or not, constitutional limits apply to every president, regardless of party.

Opinion: Does the Supreme Court ruling on birthright citizenship make sense?. The Supreme Court held in Trump v. Barbara that the 14th Amendment grants citizenship to nearly everyone born on American soil, including the children of parents who are here unlawfully or with temporary legal status

Birthright citizenship: The right's meltdown sounds familiar | Opinion. On June 30, the Supreme Court upheld the understanding of birthright citizenship that has been in pl

Calling the Supreme Court’s decision a “disgrace” does not change what the Constitution says. The 14th Amendment says people born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are citizens. The Supreme Court just rejected Trump’s attempt to limit that through executive order. It reaffirmed that birthright citizenship applies to nearly everyone born on U.S. soil, including children of undocumented immigrants and temporary residents. So let’s be clear about what Congressman Clyde is really saying. He is not defending the Constitution. He is angry that the Constitution does not say what he wants it to say. And if Congress wants to “act,” it cannot just pass a normal law that overrides the 14th Amendment. That would require changing the Constitution itself, not pretending Congress gets to redefine citizenship by slogan. You do not protect American sovereignty by stripping citizenship from babies born in America. You protect America by following the Constitution.

Birthright citizenship: Is it settled? | Opinion. The “constitutional” portion of this decision was 5-4. Does this foretell an eventual Supreme Court challenge? The recent interest in challenging “birthr

Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship on constitutional grounds. In a sharp rebuke to President Trump, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the Constitution guarantees automatic birthright citizenship to virtually all children born in the United States. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the court's 6-3 opinion

Why are you so hateful? Assuming immigrants are here to harm “us!” Birthright citizenship isn’t a “loophole”. And for once this Supreme Court got it right.

Why are you so hateful? Assuming immigrants are here to harm “us!” Birthright citizenship isn’t a “loophole”. And for once this Supreme Court got it right.

BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court upholds so-called “birthright citizenship.” If you are born in the U.S., you are a U.S. citizen.

Trump’s Dubious Claim that Birthright Citizenship Could Still Be Overturned with.... After the Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthrig

Why are you so hateful? Assuming immigrants are here to harm “us!” Birthright citizenship isn’t a “loophole”. And for once this Supreme Court got it right.

Supreme Court Backs Birthright Citizenship in Blow to Trump. The US Supreme Court rejected a central plank of President Donald Trump’s immigration agenda on Tues

Why are you so hateful? Assuming immigrants are here to harm “us!” Birthright citizenship isn’t a “loophole”. And for once this Supreme Court got it right.

In rebuke to Trump, Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, emphasizing the promise of equality in the Declaration of Independence. Pointing to the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment, the high court ruled that all babies born in the United States ‘are

The divided Supreme Court's birthright citizenship decision exposes sharp rifts among justices. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that children born in the U.S. are citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment, even if their parents are in the country unlawfully or temporarily

So if the United States is invaded all the kids born are citizens. Not the intention of the amendment but it is what it is.

Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship , rejecting Trump proposed limits | National

Birthright citizenship debate puts America melting pot on trial again | News , Sports , Jobs

Trump turns to Congress after Supreme Court strikes down birthright citizenship.... Republicans in Congress are pushing ahead on legislation to end automatic citizenship for children b

Birthright citizenship is not an “abuse.” It is in the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court did not create it. The Court upheld the long-standing constitutional rule that people born in the United States are citizens, with very limited exceptions. That principle goes back more than a century, including the 1898 Wong Kim Ark decision. If Congresswoman Miller wants to change that, she should say the quiet part out loud: she is talking about changing who counts as an American under the Constitution. That is not “protecting sovereignty.” That is rewriting citizenship because today’s politics does not like tomorrow’s voters.

Today’s Supreme Court ruling wasn’t really about whether people support or oppose immigration. It was about the Constitution. The Court held that the 14th Amendment protects birthright citizenship for nearly all children born on U.S. soil and that a president cannot change that constitutional protection through an executive order. People are free to disagree with birthright citizenship as a policy. That’s part of democracy. But if the Constitution says something different, the role of the Supreme Court is to interpret and apply the Constitution—not rewrite it. If Americans believe the 14th Amendment should be changed, there is a constitutional process for doing that. Until then, the Constitution remains the law of the land. Whether you agree with the policy or not, constitutional limits apply to every president, regardless of party.

Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, striking down Trump's order. But given the conclusion from the five-justice majority that the 14th Amendment guarantees

Birthright citizenship is not an “abuse.” It is in the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court did not create it. The Court upheld the long-standing constitutional rule that people born in the United States are citizens, with very limited exceptions. That principle goes back more than a century, including the 1898 Wong Kim Ark decision. If Congresswoman Miller wants to change that, she should say the quiet part out loud: she is talking about changing who counts as an American under the Constitution. That is not “protecting sovereignty.” That is rewriting citizenship because today’s politics does not like tomorrow’s voters.

Roberts saved birthright citizenship, ducked the real danger | Opinion. Trump's executive order would have denied citizenship only to children born after Feb. 20, 2025, but

The divided Supreme Court's birthright citizenship decision exposes sharp rifts among justices. The U.S. Supreme Court's divided ruling that children born in the U.S. are citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment — even if their parents are in the country unlawfully or only temporarily — exposed deep fissures in the justices' views on the issue and toward each other

BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court upholds so-called “birthright citizenship.” If you are born in the U.S., you are a U.S. citizen.

So if the United States is invaded all the kids born are citizens. Not the intention of the amendment but it is what it is.

Editorial : The Supreme Court has settled the birthright citizenship debate

Editorial : The Supreme Court has settled the birthright citizenship debate

BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court upholds so-called “birthright citizenship.” If you are born in the U.S., you are a U.S. citizen.

Republicans Push for Constitutional Amendment Restricting Birthright Citizenship After Supreme Court Ruling. "If we want real, lasting change, it has to come through the amendment process," Sen. Rand Paul said

Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship , rejecting Trump proposed limits

Today’s Supreme Court ruling wasn’t really about whether people support or oppose immigration. It was about the Constitution. The Court held that the 14th Amendment protects birthright citizenship for nearly all children born on U.S. soil and that a president cannot change that constitutional protection through an executive order. People are free to disagree with birthright citizenship as a policy. That’s part of democracy. But if the Constitution says something different, the role of the Supreme Court is to interpret and apply the Constitution—not rewrite it. If Americans believe the 14th Amendment should be changed, there is a constitutional process for doing that. Until then, the Constitution remains the law of the land. Whether you agree with the policy or not, constitutional limits apply to every president, regardless of party.

Split citizenship decision threatens the future of U.S. democracy. Re “Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits” (June 30): The

So if the United States is invaded all the kids born are citizens. Not the intention of the amendment but it is what it is.

Why are you so hateful? Assuming immigrants are here to harm “us!” Birthright citizenship isn’t a “loophole”. And for once this Supreme Court got it right.

Supreme Court issues rulings on birthright citizenship , campaign finance and more

The Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision is an utter disgrace. The 14th Amendment was NEVER intended to grant birthright citizenship to children of illegal aliens. Congress must immediately take action to protect American sovereignty and citizenship.

The Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision is an utter disgrace. The 14th Amendment was NEVER intended to grant birthright citizenship to children of illegal aliens. Congress must immediately take action to protect American sovereignty and citizenship.

It was an easy decision. Kids born in America are Americans. The issue of immigration is not even discussed in the Constitution. That is an entirely different issue.