Courts Find No Mass Fraud; Republicans Keep Pushing the SAVE America Act Anyway

Trump pushes SAVE America Act amid election security claims. President Donald Trump is turning up the pressure on Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, a bill that would require voters to show proof of citizenship to register to vote and a voter ID at the polls

Pass the Save America legislation

Backers of Trump voting overhaul bill scramble as SAVE America Act stalls in.... The legislation, known as the SAVE America Act, includes three main provisions: requiring proof of

Our Opinion: SAVE America Act is the real threat to elections. Let's start by ignoring what we know to be true. Cast aside the fact that no widespread fraud was discovered in the 2020 general election. Overlook the mountains of evidence discovered that noncitizens did not cast ballots

The SAVE act is voter suppression. Here is a study by the conservative heritage Foundation on how prevalent voter fraud actually is . . .

If The SAVE ACT Is Not SIGNED !! I'm VOTING Straight Republican !!

The bottom line is that the SAVE Act is not just about showing your Driver's License to vote. In fact, in almost every state a REAL ID Driver's License would not be an acceptable form of identification because it does not explicitly state that the bearer is, or is not, a U.S. citizen. The SAVE Act requires each person to prove his/her citizenship by providing a specific set of documents that millions of Americans do not have. Voting is not a privilege like driving a motor vehicle, it is a Constitutional right of every citizen that the federal government is not allowed to restrict by monetary or documentary roadblocks. If the federal government wants every American citizen to show some proof of citizenship to vote it is incumbent on the federal government to do all the work necessary to provide this proof to every single citizen free of charge and with no documentary burden on the citizen's part, something that the SAVE Act does not do.

The original iteration of the SAVE America Act sparked nationwide backlash for proposing numerous amendments to the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, perhaps chief among them a requirement that voters bring either a passport or birth certificate to register to vote. Critics argued that the mandate would unduly restrict millions of Americans from voting, pointing out that half of the country’s population lacks a passport and furthermore that the legislation as written would make it difficult for anyone who changed their name—including married women—to register. The bill would also require voters to present photo identification when casting a ballot, and a total ban on mail-in voting

SAVE ACT INFO INFORM YOURSELF READ BELOW AS TO WHY IT IS BAD 👇🏽👇🏽 🚨Critics of the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act (sometimes called the SAVE America Act) argue its primary downside is the potential to disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens by imposing strict documentary proof-of-citizenship (DPOC) requirements. Key downsides identified by voting rights advocates and policy experts include: Documentation Barriers: Over 21 million voting-eligible citizens lack ready access to documents like passports or birth certificates. Roughly half of all U.S. adults do not have a valid passport. Impact on Married Women: As many as 69 million married women may have birth certificates that do not match their current legal names. Correcting this mismatch often requires additional time-consuming and costly documentation like marriage licenses. End of Remote Registration: The bill requires voters to present proof in person at an election office. This would effectively eliminate or severely hinder: Online Voter Registration: Currently used by 42–43 states. Mail-in Registration: Mail applications would require a subsequent in-person visit to show papers. Third-Party Registration Drives: Nonprofits would be unable to collect and verify original citizenship documents. Disproportionate Impact on Marginalized Groups: Voters of Color: Citizens of color are roughly three times more likely than white citizens to lack DPOC. Rural Voters: An estimated 60 million rural voters may live hours away from the nearest election office, making in-person requirements a significant hurdle. Low-Income & Young Voters: These groups are less likely to have passports or know where their birth certificates are stored. Risk of Erroneous Purges: The Act mandates frequent voter roll purges using federal databases like those from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which critics argue are prone to errors and may remove legitimate voters. Pressure on Election Officials: Officials could face criminal penalties for registering someone without the exact required documents, even if they are a citizen. This may lead to overly cautious and restrictive interpretations of the law. While supporters argue the SAVE Act is necessary to prevent noncitizen voting, opponents note that such fraud is already illegal and exceedingly rare, making the bill an "unnecessary barrier" to a fundamental right

GOP fears over shutdown collide with SAVE America Act battle. Senate conservatives allied with President Trump are open to attaching the president’s top legislati

SAVE America Act fight heats up as Republicans try new ways to pass it. Republicans are reviving the SAVE Act through spending bills and funding plans, adding voter ID

The SAVE act is voter suppression. Here is a study by the conservative heritage Foundation on how prevalent voter fraud actually is . . .

We know Republicans want to cheat!! the SAVE America Act is meant to solve a problem that does not exist. Federal data from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services shows that noncitizen voting flags at a rate of 0.04 percent. That is not 4 percent. That is four one-hundredths of one percent. Trump is willing to hold housing legislation hostage, to demand the destruction of the Senate filibuster, and to disenfranchise millions of eligible voters to address a problem that is statistically nonexistent

We know Republicans want to cheat!! the SAVE America Act is meant to solve a problem that does not exist. Federal data from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services shows that noncitizen voting flags at a rate of 0.04 percent. That is not 4 percent. That is four one-hundredths of one percent. Trump is willing to hold housing legislation hostage, to demand the destruction of the Senate filibuster, and to disenfranchise millions of eligible voters to address a problem that is statistically nonexistent

The original iteration of the SAVE America Act sparked nationwide backlash for proposing numerous amendments to the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, perhaps chief among them a requirement that voters bring either a passport or birth certificate to register to vote. Critics argued that the mandate would unduly restrict millions of Americans from voting, pointing out that half of the country’s population lacks a passport and furthermore that the legislation as written would make it difficult for anyone who changed their name—including married women—to register. The bill would also require voters to present photo identification when casting a ballot, and a total ban on mail-in voting

Protect every lawful vote, or support the SAVE America Act? Which do you want?

Non citizens voting has been proven time and again to be a non issue.

The bottom line is that the SAVE Act is not just about showing your Driver's License to vote. In fact, in almost every state a REAL ID Driver's License would not be an acceptable form of identification because it does not explicitly state that the bearer is, or is not, a U.S. citizen. The SAVE Act requires each person to prove his/her citizenship by providing a specific set of documents that millions of Americans do not have. Voting is not a privilege like driving a motor vehicle, it is a Constitutional right of every citizen that the federal government is not allowed to restrict by monetary or documentary roadblocks. If the federal government wants every American citizen to show some proof of citizenship to vote it is incumbent on the federal government to do all the work necessary to provide this proof to every single citizen free of charge and with no documentary burden on the citizen's part, something that the SAVE Act does not do.

The bottom line is that the SAVE Act is not just about showing your Driver's License to vote. In fact, in almost every state a REAL ID Driver's License would not be an acceptable form of identification because it does not explicitly state that the bearer is, or is not, a U.S. citizen. The SAVE Act requires each person to prove his/her citizenship by providing a specific set of documents that millions of Americans do not have. Voting is not a privilege like driving a motor vehicle, it is a Constitutional right of every citizen that the federal government is not allowed to restrict by monetary or documentary roadblocks. If the federal government wants every American citizen to show some proof of citizenship to vote it is incumbent on the federal government to do all the work necessary to provide this proof to every single citizen free of charge and with no documentary burden on the citizen's part, something that the SAVE Act does not do.

If The SAVE ACT Is Not SIGNED !! I'm VOTING Straight Republican !!

Pass the Save America legislation

Most people don't understand the Save ACT requires more than a photo ID to vote. "Under the proposed SAVE Act, a state-issued REAL ID is only accepted as proof of citizenship if the ID explicitly indicates the holder's citizenship status"

The SAVE act is voter suppression. Here is a study by the conservative heritage Foundation on how prevalent voter fraud actually is . . .

The bottom line is that the SAVE Act is not just about showing your Driver's License to vote. In fact, in almost every state a REAL ID Driver's License would not be an acceptable form of identification because it does not explicitly state that the bearer is, or is not, a U.S. citizen. The SAVE Act requires each person to prove his/her citizenship by providing a specific set of documents that millions of Americans do not have. Voting is not a privilege like driving a motor vehicle, it is a Constitutional right of every citizen that the federal government is not allowed to restrict by monetary or documentary roadblocks. If the federal government wants every American citizen to show some proof of citizenship to vote it is incumbent on the federal government to do all the work necessary to provide this proof to every single citizen free of charge and with no documentary burden on the citizen's part, something that the SAVE Act does not do.

How Trump's SAVE America Act Would Change U.S. Elections. The stalled legislation would impose strict new voter-eligibility rules and ID requirements

I support voter ID, but believe the Save Act, as written, is voter suppression.

We know Republicans want to cheat!! the SAVE America Act is meant to solve a problem that does not exist. Federal data from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services shows that noncitizen voting flags at a rate of 0.04 percent. That is not 4 percent. That is four one-hundredths of one percent. Trump is willing to hold housing legislation hostage, to demand the destruction of the Senate filibuster, and to disenfranchise millions of eligible voters to address a problem that is statistically nonexistent

The bottom line is that the SAVE Act is not just about showing your Driver's License to vote. In fact, in almost every state a REAL ID Driver's License would not be an acceptable form of identification because it does not explicitly state that the bearer is, or is not, a U.S. citizen. The SAVE Act requires each person to prove his/her citizenship by providing a specific set of documents that millions of Americans do not have. Voting is not a privilege like driving a motor vehicle, it is a Constitutional right of every citizen that the federal government is not allowed to restrict by monetary or documentary roadblocks. If the federal government wants every American citizen to show some proof of citizenship to vote it is incumbent on the federal government to do all the work necessary to provide this proof to every single citizen free of charge and with no documentary burden on the citizen's part, something that the SAVE Act does not do.

SAVE ACT INFO INFORM YOURSELF READ BELOW AS TO WHY IT IS BAD 👇🏽👇🏽 🚨Critics of the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act (sometimes called the SAVE America Act) argue its primary downside is the potential to disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens by imposing strict documentary proof-of-citizenship (DPOC) requirements. Key downsides identified by voting rights advocates and policy experts include: Documentation Barriers: Over 21 million voting-eligible citizens lack ready access to documents like passports or birth certificates. Roughly half of all U.S. adults do not have a valid passport. Impact on Married Women: As many as 69 million married women may have birth certificates that do not match their current legal names. Correcting this mismatch often requires additional time-consuming and costly documentation like marriage licenses. End of Remote Registration: The bill requires voters to present proof in person at an election office. This would effectively eliminate or severely hinder: Online Voter Registration: Currently used by 42–43 states. Mail-in Registration: Mail applications would require a subsequent in-person visit to show papers. Third-Party Registration Drives: Nonprofits would be unable to collect and verify original citizenship documents. Disproportionate Impact on Marginalized Groups: Voters of Color: Citizens of color are roughly three times more likely than white citizens to lack DPOC. Rural Voters: An estimated 60 million rural voters may live hours away from the nearest election office, making in-person requirements a significant hurdle. Low-Income & Young Voters: These groups are less likely to have passports or know where their birth certificates are stored. Risk of Erroneous Purges: The Act mandates frequent voter roll purges using federal databases like those from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which critics argue are prone to errors and may remove legitimate voters. Pressure on Election Officials: Officials could face criminal penalties for registering someone without the exact required documents, even if they are a citizen. This may lead to overly cautious and restrictive interpretations of the law. While supporters argue the SAVE Act is necessary to prevent noncitizen voting, opponents note that such fraud is already illegal and exceedingly rare, making the bill an "unnecessary barrier" to a fundamental right

I agree that only citizens should vote. That is why non citizens voting is already illegal. Just like with all other laws the burden of proof is on the government to identify people breaking the law and hold them accountable. The SAVE act blows up the entire state run election systems and puts the control in the hands of the Republican controlled federal government. You have to be completely naive to think they will not use that power to guarantee Republicans will continue to control all branches of government.

I agree that only citizens should vote. That is why non citizens voting is already illegal. Just like with all other laws the burden of proof is on the government to identify people breaking the law and hold them accountable. The SAVE act blows up the entire state run election systems and puts the control in the hands of the Republican controlled federal government. You have to be completely naive to think they will not use that power to guarantee Republicans will continue to control all branches of government.

The bottom line is that the SAVE Act is not just about showing your Driver's License to vote. In fact, in almost every state a REAL ID Driver's License would not be an acceptable form of identification because it does not explicitly state that the bearer is, or is not, a U.S. citizen. The SAVE Act requires each person to prove his/her citizenship by providing a specific set of documents that millions of Americans do not have. Voting is not a privilege like driving a motor vehicle, it is a Constitutional right of every citizen that the federal government is not allowed to restrict by monetary or documentary roadblocks. If the federal government wants every American citizen to show some proof of citizenship to vote it is incumbent on the federal government to do all the work necessary to provide this proof to every single citizen free of charge and with no documentary burden on the citizen's part, something that the SAVE Act does not do.

If the save act is what you say it is then vote on it in a clean bill. Don’t hide under something else.

I agree that only citizens should vote. That is why non citizens voting is already illegal. Just like with all other laws the burden of proof is on the government to identify people breaking the law and hold them accountable. The SAVE act blows up the entire state run election systems and puts the control in the hands of the Republican controlled federal government. You have to be completely naive to think they will not use that power to guarantee Republicans will continue to control all branches of government.

Wrong! Anyone can read the SAVE America Act, and it is far, far, more intrusive than voter ID.

The bottom line is that the SAVE Act is not just about showing your Driver's License to vote. In fact, in almost every state a REAL ID Driver's License would not be an acceptable form of identification because it does not explicitly state that the bearer is, or is not, a U.S. citizen. The SAVE Act requires each person to prove his/her citizenship by providing a specific set of documents that millions of Americans do not have. Voting is not a privilege like driving a motor vehicle, it is a Constitutional right of every citizen that the federal government is not allowed to restrict by monetary or documentary roadblocks. If the federal government wants every American citizen to show some proof of citizenship to vote it is incumbent on the federal government to do all the work necessary to provide this proof to every single citizen free of charge and with no documentary burden on the citizen's part, something that the SAVE Act does not do.

We know Republicans want to cheat!! the SAVE America Act is meant to solve a problem that does not exist. Federal data from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services shows that noncitizen voting flags at a rate of 0.04 percent. That is not 4 percent. That is four one-hundredths of one percent. Trump is willing to hold housing legislation hostage, to demand the destruction of the Senate filibuster, and to disenfranchise millions of eligible voters to address a problem that is statistically nonexistent

Will you also tell people who listen to you that (conservative!) studies show that incidents of voting by non-citizens are practically non-existent and that the SAVE Act is a solution in search of a problem? And, if you want to go a step further, you could tell them the REAL reason Trump wants the SAVE Act passed. I think each of these statements would be steps in the direction of good leadership.

Wrong! Anyone can read the SAVE America Act, and it is far, far, more intrusive than voter ID.

President Trump's claims on election security and the Save America Act. In a recent address, President Trump raised concerns regarding the vulnerabilities in the U.S. election system and promoted the Save America Act, which would mandate proof of citizenship to vote. Fact-checking by PolitiFact highlighted discrepancies in Trump's claims,

GOP fears over shutdown collide with SAVE America Act battle. Senate conservatives allied with President Trump are open to attaching the president's top legislative priority, the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE America) Act, to a stopgap measure

Non citizens voting has been proven time and again to be a non issue.

SAVE ACT INFO INFORM YOURSELF READ BELOW AS TO WHY IT IS BAD 👇🏽👇🏽 🚨Critics of the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act (sometimes called the SAVE America Act) argue its primary downside is the potential to disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens by imposing strict documentary proof-of-citizenship (DPOC) requirements. Key downsides identified by voting rights advocates and policy experts include: Documentation Barriers: Over 21 million voting-eligible citizens lack ready access to documents like passports or birth certificates. Roughly half of all U.S. adults do not have a valid passport. Impact on Married Women: As many as 69 million married women may have birth certificates that do not match their current legal names. Correcting this mismatch often requires additional time-consuming and costly documentation like marriage licenses. End of Remote Registration: The bill requires voters to present proof in person at an election office. This would effectively eliminate or severely hinder: Online Voter Registration: Currently used by 42–43 states. Mail-in Registration: Mail applications would require a subsequent in-person visit to show papers. Third-Party Registration Drives: Nonprofits would be unable to collect and verify original citizenship documents. Disproportionate Impact on Marginalized Groups: Voters of Color: Citizens of color are roughly three times more likely than white citizens to lack DPOC. Rural Voters: An estimated 60 million rural voters may live hours away from the nearest election office, making in-person requirements a significant hurdle. Low-Income & Young Voters: These groups are less likely to have passports or know where their birth certificates are stored. Risk of Erroneous Purges: The Act mandates frequent voter roll purges using federal databases like those from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which critics argue are prone to errors and may remove legitimate voters. Pressure on Election Officials: Officials could face criminal penalties for registering someone without the exact required documents, even if they are a citizen. This may lead to overly cautious and restrictive interpretations of the law. While supporters argue the SAVE Act is necessary to prevent noncitizen voting, opponents note that such fraud is already illegal and exceedingly rare, making the bill an "unnecessary barrier" to a fundamental right

Good news! Election integrity is already secure! I hope people are keeping a list of everyone who still advocates for the SAVE bill so that they know who to vote against in November.

Most people don't understand the Save ACT requires more than a photo ID to vote. "Under the proposed SAVE Act, a state-issued REAL ID is only accepted as proof of citizenship if the ID explicitly indicates the holder's citizenship status"

I agree with the comment about needing free and fair elections. I do not agree that that is what the SAVE Act will accomplish that or is intended to.

SAVE ACT INFO INFORM YOURSELF READ BELOW AS TO WHY IT IS BAD 👇🏽👇🏽 🚨Critics of the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act (sometimes called the SAVE America Act) argue its primary downside is the potential to disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens by imposing strict documentary proof-of-citizenship (DPOC) requirements. Key downsides identified by voting rights advocates and policy experts include: Documentation Barriers: Over 21 million voting-eligible citizens lack ready access to documents like passports or birth certificates. Roughly half of all U.S. adults do not have a valid passport. Impact on Married Women: As many as 69 million married women may have birth certificates that do not match their current legal names. Correcting this mismatch often requires additional time-consuming and costly documentation like marriage licenses. End of Remote Registration: The bill requires voters to present proof in person at an election office. This would effectively eliminate or severely hinder: Online Voter Registration: Currently used by 42–43 states. Mail-in Registration: Mail applications would require a subsequent in-person visit to show papers. Third-Party Registration Drives: Nonprofits would be unable to collect and verify original citizenship documents. Disproportionate Impact on Marginalized Groups: Voters of Color: Citizens of color are roughly three times more likely than white citizens to lack DPOC. Rural Voters: An estimated 60 million rural voters may live hours away from the nearest election office, making in-person requirements a significant hurdle. Low-Income & Young Voters: These groups are less likely to have passports or know where their birth certificates are stored. Risk of Erroneous Purges: The Act mandates frequent voter roll purges using federal databases like those from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which critics argue are prone to errors and may remove legitimate voters. Pressure on Election Officials: Officials could face criminal penalties for registering someone without the exact required documents, even if they are a citizen. This may lead to overly cautious and restrictive interpretations of the law. While supporters argue the SAVE Act is necessary to prevent noncitizen voting, opponents note that such fraud is already illegal and exceedingly rare, making the bill an "unnecessary barrier" to a fundamental right

The bottom line is that the SAVE Act is not just about showing your Driver's License to vote. In fact, in almost every state a REAL ID Driver's License would not be an acceptable form of identification because it does not explicitly state that the bearer is, or is not, a U.S. citizen. The SAVE Act requires each person to prove his/her citizenship by providing a specific set of documents that millions of Americans do not have. Voting is not a privilege like driving a motor vehicle, it is a Constitutional right of every citizen that the federal government is not allowed to restrict by monetary or documentary roadblocks. If the federal government wants every American citizen to show some proof of citizenship to vote it is incumbent on the federal government to do all the work necessary to provide this proof to every single citizen free of charge and with no documentary burden on the citizen's part, something that the SAVE Act does not do.

SAVE ACT INFO INFORM YOURSELF READ BELOW AS TO WHY IT IS BAD 👇🏽👇🏽 🚨Critics of the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act (sometimes called the SAVE America Act) argue its primary downside is the potential to disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens by imposing strict documentary proof-of-citizenship (DPOC) requirements. Key downsides identified by voting rights advocates and policy experts include: Documentation Barriers: Over 21 million voting-eligible citizens lack ready access to documents like passports or birth certificates. Roughly half of all U.S. adults do not have a valid passport. Impact on Married Women: As many as 69 million married women may have birth certificates that do not match their current legal names. Correcting this mismatch often requires additional time-consuming and costly documentation like marriage licenses. End of Remote Registration: The bill requires voters to present proof in person at an election office. This would effectively eliminate or severely hinder: Online Voter Registration: Currently used by 42–43 states. Mail-in Registration: Mail applications would require a subsequent in-person visit to show papers. Third-Party Registration Drives: Nonprofits would be unable to collect and verify original citizenship documents. Disproportionate Impact on Marginalized Groups: Voters of Color: Citizens of color are roughly three times more likely than white citizens to lack DPOC. Rural Voters: An estimated 60 million rural voters may live hours away from the nearest election office, making in-person requirements a significant hurdle. Low-Income & Young Voters: These groups are less likely to have passports or know where their birth certificates are stored. Risk of Erroneous Purges: The Act mandates frequent voter roll purges using federal databases like those from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which critics argue are prone to errors and may remove legitimate voters. Pressure on Election Officials: Officials could face criminal penalties for registering someone without the exact required documents, even if they are a citizen. This may lead to overly cautious and restrictive interpretations of the law. While supporters argue the SAVE Act is necessary to prevent noncitizen voting, opponents note that such fraud is already illegal and exceedingly rare, making the bill an "unnecessary barrier" to a fundamental right

Johnson's strategy to bypass Democrats' SAVE Act blockade survives key vote,.... The Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act has faced significant headwinds in Co