Voter Fraud Is Virtually Nonexistent; Republicans Exploit Grocery-ID Anecdote to Push Restrictive ID Laws

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Can the ID used to buy groceries also be used to vote?

So they need ID to prove their residency before they can buy groceries, but they don't need an ID to vote?

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

So they need ID to prove their residency before they can buy groceries, but they don't need an ID to vote?

If an ID is acceptable to access discounted city-run groceries, it’s fair for people to ask why ID requirements are viewed differently in other contexts. Consistency matters.

So they need ID to prove their residency before they can buy groceries, but they don't need an ID to vote?

So they need ID to prove their residency before they can buy groceries, but they don't need an ID to vote?

So they need ID to prove their residency before they can buy groceries, but they don't need an ID to vote?

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Mamdani hits back at 'insane' MAGA claim about Trump voter ID law. Mamdani hits back at 'insane' MAGA claim that grocery rules prove need for Trump voter ID law - New York City officials say no ID is required to use the mayor's planned low-price grocery stores

ID to go to a grocery store but not to vote.

Congresswoman Laurel Lee, your question is a wrong premise (lie or honest mistake): Most Democrats aren't opposed to PHOTO ID to vote, but rather onerous document requirements to register, re-register, and such. See my email with a proposed compromise I sent your Leg Team, and which was vetted by 5 AI models and myself, Rep. Laurel Lee, and please let me know your thoughts. Said email dated 7-31-2026, addresses this and 4 additional topics. @highlight to @followers Gordon Wayne Watts, Constituent, CD-FL-15

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

So they need ID to prove their residency before they can buy groceries, but they don't need an ID to vote?

ID to go to a grocery store but not to vote.

Can the ID used to buy groceries also be used to vote?

We support voter ID we just oppose weaponizing it to keep people from voting

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

This highlights the fallacy: the mistaken belief that a standard government-issued ID alone would satisfy voting requirements under the SAVE Act. Under the SAVE Act, married women face the steepest hurdle because a standard photo ID and a birth certificate alone will not match if they took their spouse's surname. Because the Act explicitly demands proof of citizenship linked directly to a legal identity, name discrepancies can completely stall a voter's registration. We can successfully establish a voter ID system. It will require time and financial investment to fund the project, hire personnel, lease facilities, and procure secure printing equipment with anti-counterfeiting features. The ultimate goal must be to issue these cards for FREE to every eligible voter. It is time to present a respectable proposal that secures our elections without disadvantaging voters like the Save America Act would.

So they need ID to prove their residency before they can buy groceries, but they don't need an ID to vote?

Funny and every state i've lived in , I needed an ID to register to vote and to get that id I needed to show my birth certificate.... that whole real I d thing.

This highlights the fallacy: the mistaken belief that a standard government-issued ID alone would satisfy voting requirements under the SAVE Act. Under the SAVE Act, married women face the steepest hurdle because a standard photo ID and a birth certificate alone will not match if they took their spouse's surname. Because the Act explicitly demands proof of citizenship linked directly to a legal identity, name discrepancies can completely stall a voter's registration. We can successfully establish a voter ID system. It will require time and financial investment to fund the project, hire personnel, lease facilities, and procure secure printing equipment with anti-counterfeiting features. The ultimate goal must be to issue these cards for FREE to every eligible voter. It is time to present a respectable proposal that secures our elections without disadvantaging voters like the Save America Act would.

Congressman Greg Steube's right that there's irony in local politics this week — but it's not the irony he thinks. NYC's planned grocery stores use an ID system to confirm you live in the five boroughs, so a discount funded by NYC taxpayers doesn't get scooped up by out-of-state shoppers. That's the same logic behind library cards, SNAP benefits, and in-state tuition — verifying eligibility for a specific public program. Voter ID debates were never about opposing the concept of identification; they were about the burden that documentation requirements place on eligible citizens who lack easy access to a DMV, a birth certificate, or the fees involved. Comparing a grocery discount card to the right to vote isn't a "gotcha" — it's a category error, and it's designed to make you angry rather than informed.

Congresswoman Laurel Lee, your question is a wrong premise (lie or honest mistake): Most Democrats aren't opposed to PHOTO ID to vote, but rather onerous document requirements to register, re-register, and such. See my email with a proposed compromise I sent your Leg Team, and which was vetted by 5 AI models and myself, Rep. Laurel Lee, and please let me know your thoughts. Said email dated 7-31-2026, addresses this and 4 additional topics. @highlight to @followers Gordon Wayne Watts, Constituent, CD-FL-15

We support voter ID we just oppose weaponizing it to keep people from voting

So they need ID to prove their residency before they can buy groceries, but they don't need an ID to vote?

We support voter ID we just oppose weaponizing it to keep people from voting

This highlights the fallacy: the mistaken belief that a standard government-issued ID alone would satisfy voting requirements under the SAVE Act. Under the SAVE Act, married women face the steepest hurdle because a standard photo ID and a birth certificate alone will not match if they took their spouse's surname. Because the Act explicitly demands proof of citizenship linked directly to a legal identity, name discrepancies can completely stall a voter's registration. We can successfully establish a voter ID system. It will require time and financial investment to fund the project, hire personnel, lease facilities, and procure secure printing equipment with anti-counterfeiting features. The ultimate goal must be to issue these cards for FREE to every eligible voter. It is time to present a respectable proposal that secures our elections without disadvantaging voters like the Save America Act would.

So they need ID to prove their residency before they can buy groceries, but they don't need an ID to vote?

So they need ID to prove their residency before they can buy groceries, but they don't need an ID to vote?

This highlights the fallacy: the mistaken belief that a standard government-issued ID alone would satisfy voting requirements under the SAVE Act. Under the SAVE Act, married women face the steepest hurdle because a standard photo ID and a birth certificate alone will not match if they took their spouse's surname. Because the Act explicitly demands proof of citizenship linked directly to a legal identity, name discrepancies can completely stall a voter's registration. We can successfully establish a voter ID system. It will require time and financial investment to fund the project, hire personnel, lease facilities, and procure secure printing equipment with anti-counterfeiting features. The ultimate goal must be to issue these cards for FREE to every eligible voter. It is time to present a respectable proposal that secures our elections without disadvantaging voters like the Save America Act would.

Got it. ID for food? Absolutely. ID for voting? Suddenly that’s a problem. The logic is fascinating. 😂

Got it. ID for food? Absolutely. ID for voting? Suddenly that’s a problem. The logic is fascinating. 😂

Sooo, IDs for food but not for voting. 🤦🏻‍♀️🙄

We already show an ID when we vote. It’s called registration.