CBC Already Calls 9/11 Terrorism; Republicans Exploit Memo to Smear Mainstream Media
Media delegitimization & erosion of shared reality
Despite the broadcaster’s public record describing 9/11 as terrorism, Republicans seize on an internal memo to paint the outlet as unpatriotic and untrustworthy. The aim is to erode public confidence in professional journalism.
Not currently in top 6 — This topic dropped out of the trending list. Last seen 1mo ago. It may return if the talking point is picked up again.
Appeared in top 6 36 times — first seen 1mo ago
Spread Overview
Narrative Spread Timeline
Echo post volume by day, broken down by platform — click a bar to filter the echo feed below to that date
Bars stacked by platform. Click a bar to filter echoes below. ⚡ in tooltip = volume spike above average.
Platform Breakdown
Message Mutation Examples
The original talking point alongside the closest echo found and the most drifted echo — see exactly how the message changed in transit
Despite the broadcaster’s public record describing 9/11 as terrorism, Republicans seize on an internal memo to paint the outlet as unpatriotic and untrustworthy. The aim is to erode public confidence in professional journalism.
Canadian broadcaster reverses policy barring use of 'terrorist attack' label for 9/11. In an internal memo this week first reported by The Toronto Sun, CBC’s senior director of journalistic standards and public
Yes. Describe the attack as a false flag organized by Mossad and CIA
Echo Posts
Non-government posts and articles echoing this talking point, sorted by date
Canadian broadcaster reverses policy barring use of 'terrorist attack' label for 9/11. In an internal memo this week first reported by The Toronto Sun, CBC’s senior director of journalistic standards and public
After criticism, Canada's CBC changes policy that said not to label 9/11 attacks.... Canada’s public broadcaster is making an exception to its policy of not labeling specific attacks as
Canada's CBC changes how it covers 9/11 after FBI warning, Republican fury. The CBC's policy not to call the September 11, 2001 attacks "terrorism" drew a wave of conservative
Canada's CBC Instructs Journalists to Not Call 9/11 'Terrorist Attack' in 25th Anniversary Coverage. This stance has faced backlash from politicians, with critics arguing it undermines the experiences of victims and first responders, calling it disrespectful and shameful., Canada, Times Now
CBC memo tells staff not to call 9/11 'terrorist attacks'. CBC advises journalists not to label 9/11 as "terrorist attacks" without attribution, sparking criticism over journalistic standards
After criticism, Canada's CBC changes policy that said not to label 9/11 attacks.... Canada’s public broadcaster said Friday it is making an exception to its policy of not labeling spec
They're correct. It's not the job of journalists to attribute their own adjectives, but to report what outside sources say. Many outside sources refer to 911 as a 'terrorist' attack so they just need to attribute that. Easy-peasy.
Canada has no control over what happens in the United States of AMERICA the last time I checked. 911 is still etched in the minds of all Americans and foreigners should keep their comments to themselves.
Canada wanted to do a 9/11 special that did not focus on the terrorists but instead the incident and response. Now angry conservative pundits are saying Canada is defending terrorists. 🤷♂️ The war in Iran must be doing really bad this week.
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation reportedly advises reporters to avoid calling 9/11 'terrorism'. "The refusal to call it an act of terror harms the dignity of the victims," said Rachel Thomas, a Member of Parliament from the Conservative Party
Some events in history should be described clearly and honestly. September 11 was a terrorist attack, and acknowledging that does not require rewriting or politicizing the facts. We can be careful with language without losing sight of what actually happened.
Some events in history should be described clearly and honestly. September 11 was a terrorist attack, and acknowledging that does not require rewriting or politicizing the facts. We can be careful with language without losing sight of what actually happened.
Muslim Immigrant CBC Boss Warns “Do Not Refer to the Sept. 11 Attacks as Terrorist Attacks”. It goes on. “The hijackings led to passenger jet crashes,” it reads, again in italics. There is no recognition in the CBC
Report: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Dictates that 9/11 Cannot Be Called a .... As bad as the U.S. journalism complex can be, the trade plied by our neighbors above exists at
They're correct. It's not the job of journalists to attribute their own adjectives, but to report what outside sources say. Many outside sources refer to 911 as a 'terrorist' attack so they just need to attribute that. Easy-peasy.
And how else should 9/11 be referred to?… “ an miscalculated accident… eh Canada 🇨🇦??
After criticism, Canada’s CBC changes policy that said not to label 9/11 attacks.... OTTAWA (AP) — Canada’s public broadcaster said Friday it is making an exception to its policy of not
Canada wanted to do a 9/11 special that did not focus on the terrorists but instead the incident and response. Now angry conservative pundits are saying Canada is defending terrorists. 🤷♂️ The war in Iran must be doing really bad this week.
CBC's refusal to say terrorism should alarm all Canadians. Twenty-five years after nineteen hijackers murdered 2,977 people, including two dozen Canadians, the Canadian Broadcasting
Canada wanted to do a 9/11 special that did not focus on the terrorists but instead the incident and response. Now angry conservative pundits are saying Canada is defending terrorists. 🤷♂️ The war in Iran must be doing really bad this week.
Yes. Describe the attack as a false flag organized by Mossad and CIA
CBC tells journalists not to call 9/11 ‘terrorist attacks’ in internal guidance. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation memo told staff not to call 9/11 a terrorist attack ahead of
This is the process of changing history a word at a time. Is Canadian political figures colluding with Iran and all their terrorist proxies? Is Canada becoming a terrorist country?
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation tells staff not to refer to 9/11 as 'terrorist attacks'. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation told staff not to refer to the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks as "terrorist attacks" in their news coverage without attribution
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation tells staff not to refer to 9/11 as terror attacks in coverage. Journalists with the Canadian network can still describe the event as an "attack," but warned against using words like "terror" or "terrorists."
The CBC's big lie: people noticed.. CBC said 9/11 wasn’t a terror attack.I received the email on Wednesday. The source(s) wished to remain confidential. The
Neither one of the descriptions above that they wouldn’t say are even right. It was an Islamic terrorist attack. And it’s not even debatable
They're correct. It's not the job of journalists to attribute their own adjectives, but to report what outside sources say. Many outside sources refer to 911 as a 'terrorist' attack so they just need to attribute that. Easy-peasy.
They're correct. It's not the job of journalists to attribute their own adjectives, but to report what outside sources say. Many outside sources refer to 911 as a 'terrorist' attack so they just need to attribute that. Easy-peasy.
LILLEY: If CBC can't call 9/11 terrorism, why should anyone trust it?. See more Toronto Sun on Google — save as a Preferred Source
It's Not Just The CBC Saying 9/11 Shouldn't Be Called Terrorism. The Canadian broadcaster says the term "terrorist" has become politicized and should be avoided when talking about 9/11. Others say that minimizes the horror of what happened that day
Canadian broadcaster reverses policy barring use of ‘terrorist attack’ label for.... The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s (CBC) walked back its move Friday to advise its journalists
Canada wanted to do a 9/11 special that did not focus on the terrorists but instead the incident and response. Now angry conservative pundits are saying Canada is defending terrorists. 🤷♂️ The war in Iran must be doing really bad this week.
They're correct. It's not the job of journalists to attribute their own adjectives, but to report what outside sources say. Many outside sources refer to 911 as a 'terrorist' attack so they just need to attribute that. Easy-peasy.
...."credible sources such as government officials, authorities, experts, politicians".... I wonder if they realize what an oxymoron their statement is. Their list is the antithesis of credible.
Woke taxpayer funded TV station is shamed into changing rule that banned 9/11 being described as terror attack... read boss's word-salad excuse. News Senior Director of Journalistic Standards and Public Trust Basem Boshra made the noticeably begrudging announcement
...."credible sources such as government officials, authorities, experts, politicians".... I wonder if they realize what an oxymoron their statement is. Their list is the antithesis of credible.
CBC tells journalists not to call 9/11 'terrorist attacks' in internal guidance. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation memo told staff not to call 9/11 a terrorist attack ahead of the 25th anniversary, sparking political backlash
They're correct. It's not the job of journalists to attribute their own adjectives, but to report what outside sources say. Many outside sources refer to 911 as a 'terrorist' attack so they just need to attribute that. Easy-peasy.
LILLEY: CBC's 9/11 retreat doesn't fix its terrorism problem. In the face of worldwide public outcry and a dressing down by the Carney government, CBC has announced that its journalists
...."credible sources such as government officials, authorities, experts, politicians".... I wonder if they realize what an oxymoron their statement is. Their list is the antithesis of credible.
Canada's CBC instructs staff not to call 9/11 a 'terrorist attack' in news coverage. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation instructed its staff not to refer to the killings in 9/11 as "terrorist attacks" ahead of their coverage of its 25th anniversary, according to an
After criticism, Canada's CBC changes policy that said not to label 9/11 attacks.... Canada’s public broadcaster is making an exception to its policy of not labeling specific attacks as
Neither one of the descriptions above that they wouldn’t say are even right. It was an Islamic terrorist attack. And it’s not even debatable
CBC releases policy change after controversy about refusing to refer to 9/11 as .... The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's leaked memo told journalists not to call 9/11 a terrorist
They're correct. It's not the job of journalists to attribute their own adjectives, but to report what outside sources say. Many outside sources refer to 911 as a 'terrorist' attack so they just need to attribute that. Easy-peasy.
A little more nuanced than this "gotcha" headline. CBC's explanation is that it has a longstanding policy against journalists themselves labeling people or acts “terrorist” or “terrorism” without attribution. CBC spokesperson Kerry Kelly said the terms are considered politically and emotionally loaded and that journalists should attribute them to credible sources such as government officials, authorities, experts, or politicians.
Juno Jump Start: CBC orders reporters not to call 9/11 a 'terrorist attack' in leaked memo. Internal guidance for the attack's 25th anniversary tells journalists to attribute the term "terrorism" rather than use it independently
Some events in history should be described clearly and honestly. September 11 was a terrorist attack, and acknowledging that does not require rewriting or politicizing the facts. We can be careful with language without losing sight of what actually happened.
Yes. Describe the attack as a false flag organized by Mossad and CIA
Showing 50 of 85 total echoes.